>>>>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 17:28:02 -0700,
>>>>> Alain Durand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> At this time, the chairs believe that there is code that
>> sets the M&O bits and at least one implementation that reads and acts
>> on these bits.
> This is certainly not enough to claim interoperability.
Moreover, this (what Brian said) is not correct, as far as I know.
The facts are:
1. there is code that sets the M&O bits. (router implementations)
2. there are at least two implementations that read and act on the O
bit. These two implementations both invoke stateless DHCPv6 as
the action.
3. there is no known implementation that reads and acts on the M
bit.
As I repeatedly said, I don't stick to deprecating these bits.
However, we at least need to discuss things on the correct
information.
My biggest question is: can we recycle rfc2462bis as DS despite fact
3?
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
