> From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= > conditions, just delaying Neighbor Solicitation would cause > congestion by the MLD report messages. The congestion would then > prevent MLD-snooping switches from working correctly, and, as a > result, prevent Duplicate Address Detection from working.
Just a refresh of my opinion on this (so that people don't forget): Sending MLD reports on link local multicast groups is silly, and SHOULD NOT be required. It is not nice to require modifications and warts to perfectly working RFC due to layer breaking entities like MLD-snooping switches. Especially, when exactly the same information would be available to them from the DAD NS. Join for "solicited node multicast group" has exactly the same information as DAD NS. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
