> I first would like to know your opinion, if any, on my latest question
> (in the separate message).  If we choose option 1 (i.e., basically do
> nothing on this), we still might want to clarify what "match the
> prefix" means to avoid possible confusion.

I think we should clarify this. The word "match" is unfortunate.
Either just saying "identical" or also stating that prefixes are
identical when their length as well as content are the same would
be good.

  Erik


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to