In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:34:58 +0200), Stig Venaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> > the behavior (relationship between AF_INET and AF_INET6 sockets/binds) > > is not documented, so there's no standard. sigh. > > I second that. I would hope that also Linux allows you to bind both > AF_INET6 and AF_INET when using IPV6_V6ONLY socket option; I think that > would be reasonable and logical behaviour. I don't know if that is the > case though. Linux supports IPV6_V6ONLY socket option (default: off, as the RFC says). If you set IPV6_V6ONLY socket option, you can bind(2) both IPv6 and IPv4 sockets on the port. Thanks. -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
