>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 03:50:51 -0400,
>>>>> "Soliman Hesham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Yes, so if we allow the mixed behavior, then it is probably
>> reasonable
>> to allow the node to accept RAs on a "host" interface and to
>> configure
>> default routers on that interface. My point is that we should
>> *explicitly* note that the rule for the multi-interfaced hosts also
>> applies to the host-side interfaces on a mixed-behavior node.
> => We can explicitly state it but I think an important point here is that
> the spec already allows for this. We can always add more text I suppose,
> it's a matter of taste.
Wait a minute...what's the source on why you think "the spec already
allows for this"? (And I'm feeling I'm a bit confused about what
"this" exactly means).
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
