>>>>> On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 01:58:56 +1000,
>>>>> "Nick 'Sharkey' Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'd also be interested in other opinions ... somehow we've
> got to reach a rough consensus on this (we've already got
> running code ...)
A quick check: what kind of "rough consensus" are you talking about?
At least I'm not convinced that the unsolicited NAs as a signal for
mobility-supporting routers is necessary.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
