>>>>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:25:54 -0400 (EDT),
>>>>> Suresh Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Looks like this one is truncated too :-(. Can you try submitting the
> text file as an attachment instead of a pointer to a URL when you submit.
> Are there any changes from -03 ?
Hmm...this time I explicitly noted that the draft contains 31 pages
and ask the I-D secretariat to make sure to issue the complete
draft (see below)...still, the truncation happens. I don't have any
idea why on earth this could happen.
Perhaps submitting the draft as a link to my web server somehow
doesn't work. I'll soon resubmit the draft (probably with
incrementing the version number) in a different way.
At the moment, you can refer to the complete draft at the URL shown in
the attachment. But most of you won't care about the content, since
the difference from 03 is very minor.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Begin Message ---
Dear I-D administrators,
Please find a new (revision of) internet-draft
"draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-04.txt" at the following URL:
http://www.jinmei.org/draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-04.txt
and issue it as a new I-D.
Thanks,
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p.s. this draft contains 31 pages. Please make sure the full 31 pages
are available at the IETF archive. The previous version of this
document, which was submitted in the same way, was somehow truncated
at the official archive. I didn't understand why that happened, but I
don't want to see that again. Thanks!
--- End Message ---
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
