>>>>> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:46:22 +0530,
>>>>> Radhakrishnan Suryanarayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > An implementation might explore an implementation dependent trick like
>> > combining routers and parameters to mitigate the bad effect of the
>> > admin error. However, I'd really want to make it outside the scope of
>> > the M/O document.
>>
>> I agree with this,
>>
>> In this case, we need to ensure that the router advertisement which
>> we're basing the decision on has the flags set.
>>
>> It may even be worthwhile explicitly stating that management of
>> flags from multiple routers is not in scope.
> Since the idea of the draft is for BCP/Informational on M&O, we shall as
> well add an
> appendix section to describe handling of the flags from multiple routers.
I don't mind adding the appendix as long we just describe possible
issues (if any) and do NOT try to provide workaround like combining
router/parameters.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
