>>>>> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:12:09 +0900,
>>>>> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> FYI, attached below are comments on
> draft-ietf-ipv6-scoping-arch-01.txt from the IESG. I'm going to
> propose resolutions in separate messages, copying to each reviewer.
(Forgot to mention this) I've simply accepted the following two
comments, for which I won't make explicit responses.
>> Scott Hollenbeck:
>> Comment:
>> [2004-07-01] A table of contents would be helpful. The I-D checklist
>> says one is required for documents longer than 15 pages.
>> Bert Wijnen:
>> Comment:
>> [2004-07-08]
>> This formulation (towards bottom of page 6) sounds/feels a bit strange:
>> dedicated purpose. An entry of a Management Information Base (MIB)
>> will be an example of the dedicated purpose. The actual
>> Not sure what "An entry of a .. (MIB)" is.
>> Maybe a better sentence might be
>> Usage of the index to identify an entry in the Management Information
>> Base (MIB) is an example of the dedicated purpose.
p.s. when I first received the comments, I didn't know the
categorization of the IESG comments (e.g., "DISCUSS" seems to be
something like a "mandatory comment for publication", but the
semantics is not very trivial for me). Is there a pointer that talks
about this point?
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
