>>>>> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:04:35 +0900, >>>>> "S. Daniel Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I've catched one minor missing of 2461bis when responding M/O flags. > [snip] > O 1-bit "Other stateful configuration" flag. When > set, it indicates that [DHCPv6-lite] is available > for autoconfiguration of other (non-address) > information. Examples of such information are DNS- > related information or information on other servers > within the network. The use of this flag for add is > further described in [ADDRCONF]. > [snip] > [DHCPv6-lite] does not appear in the References Section. > http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3736.xml Also, I'm not sure if "DHCPv6-lite" is an appropriate anchor for RFC3736. As far as I know, this phrase has only been used in ML and/or oral discussions and is not defined in any RFCs (or even in I-Ds). So, I'd simply use [RFC3736] or [Stateless-DHCPv6]. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
