OK with me.
Regards,
Elwyn
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 18 August 2004 15:03
> To: Davies, Elwyn [HAL02:0S00:EXCH]
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-05.txt
>
>
> One more "easy" point:
>
> >>>>> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:43:04 +0100,
> >>>>> "Elwyn Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> > As mentioned elsewhere the para on the use of the M and O
> >> flags in s.4
> >> > should reiterate the requirement that hosts have stateless
> >> autoconfiguration
> >> > enabled by default when thay come out of the box to ensure full
> >> > 'plug-and-play' behaviour.
> >>
> >> (I'm not sure what "As mentioned elsewhere" means, but in
> any event)
> >> I personally do not see the need for this...IMO, this
> would rather be
> >> a matter of the node requirement document (and, in my
> understanding,
> >> the node-req document is already pretty clear on this).
>
> > Elsewhere refers to S 5.5 which says (referring to creation
> of Global
> > Addresses from info in RAs '...the processing described
> below MUST be
> > enabled by default'. I think this is sufficiently
> important (it goes to the
> > heart of plug and play operation) that it is worth a sentence in the
> > Protocol Overview - the words on M and O in previous
> versions didn't allow
> > any ambiguity. How about adding a sentence after the para
> at the top of
> > page 10 (ending '...in a separate document.'):
> > However a host uses the M and O flags, and local
> configuration to control
> > autoconfiguration, the default setting will result in
> received Router
> > Advertisements being processed.
>
> Hmm, I still don't see the strong need for this, but it is a minor
> change that may help, so I don't mind to add this with a small
> modification: "received Router Advertisements being processed" is
> ambiguous. I'd reword this to:
>
> the default setting will result in received Router Advertisements
> being processed for stateless address autoconfiguration.
>
> JINMEI, Tatuya
> Communication Platform Lab.
> Corporate R&D Center,
> Toshiba Corp.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
