It is relevant completely to users and implementation your wrong.

But all marked cells for all matrice possibilities for m or o should be permitted.

/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: JINMEI Tatuya / çæéå [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 8:05 AM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: Christian Huitema; S. Daniel Park; 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: M=1/O=0 is not valid in full 3315 ?
> 
> >>>>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 07:54:48 -0400, "Bound, Jim" 
> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 
> > I did not ever agree to that as a note. If it is set the admin has 
> > said you should use it the admin is in charge not the host.
> 
> Fine, but please note that this particular point is not at 
> all relevant to the main issue of this thread.  Since even 
> the main discussion has fully diverged, please change the 
> subject if you want to continue the discussion on what 
> Christian said to avoid further chaos.
> 
> Thanks...
> 
>                                       JINMEI, Tatuya
>                                       Communication Platform Lab.
>                                       Corporate R&D Center, 
> Toshiba Corp.
>                                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> >> > Besides, as jinmei indicated earlier as editor of 2462bis,
> >> M flag (ON)
> >> > indicated that the host (should) use the stateful protocol
> >> for address
> >> > autoconfiguration. This should mean the M flag (ON) indicates 
> >> > Solicit/Advertise/Request/Reply.
> >> 
> >> I disagree with the "host should use" part of this statement. 
> >> We reached a consensus on this point in previous discussion. 
> >> The consensus is "the
> >> M=1 flag indicates that the host MAY use the stateful protocol for 
> >> address autoconfiguration" -- i.e., that this protocol is 
> available 
> >> should the host decide to use it.
> >> 
> >> -- Christian Huitema
> >> 
> >> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Administrative Requests: 
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> >> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> 
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to