>>>>> On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 00:17:19 -0400,
>>>>> Ralph Droms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I disagree with this wording. In particular, the Solicit/...
> exchange is *not* limites to address configuration.
Yes, but regarding the interaction with the M flag, shouldn't the
Solicit/... exchange at least *contain* address configuration?
(Recall that the M flag should be defined as (an
indication/availability of) a couter part of "stateless address
autoconfiguration").
So,
> I don't think the purpose of the exchanges need to be
> mentioned. I think the following would suffice:
I would respectfully disagree with this while I see your other points.
> M = ON means configuration information is available from a DHCPv6 service
> through Solicit/Advertise/Request/Reply or Solicit/Reply (if Rapid Commit is
> enabled) message exchanges.
> O = ON means configuration information is available from a DHCPv6 service
> through Information-request /Reply message exchanges.
How about changing those to:
M = ON means configuration information (including addresses to be
allocated) is available from a DHCPv6 service through
Solicit/Advertise/Request/Reply or Solicit/Reply (if Rapid Commit is
enabled) message exchanges.
O = ON means configuration information (excluding addresses) is
available from a DHCPv6 service through Information-request /Reply
message exchanges.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
