Fred, Let me make sure that I understand your preference clearly.
Are you saying that we should leave the section 2.4 (f) as it was in RFC 2463 ? I think, we already discussed a lot about this and decided that we will remove the Timer-based and the Bandwidth-based rate limiting mechanisms and only have the token-bucket method. And as far as I understand, Alex didn't want to bring the Timer-based and Bandwidth-based methods back. He just wanted the token-bucket method's parameter (N and B) to be configurable per interface in addition to per node. Regards Mukesh > -----Original Message----- > From: Fred Templin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 5:27 PM > To: Gupta Mukesh (Nokia-NET/MtView) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ICMPv6: Rate Limiting Configuration Per-Node or > Per-Interfaces > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >In your opinion (no reasoning please), the rate limiting > >configuration per-interface in the ICMPv6 spec should be a > > > >1) SHOULD > >2) MAY > >3) Any of them is fine for you. > > > > Bandwidth-based per-interface rate limiting is: > > 1) SHOULD > > In other words, leave current text of [RFC2463], section 2.4 > (f) as-is. > > Fred > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
