Hi,
The following comment was received from Elwyn Davies:
S6.3.4: (next to last para on p49): The restriction in setting the LinkMTU to
be not greater than the default value specified in the link type specific document
is odd and actually inconsistent with the statements in RFC2590 for example (which
allows LinkMTUs both larger and smaller than the default).
I'm not sure about the history of this so I wanted to get some
feedback from the authors or other members if possible. It is
true that RFC 2590 allows for MTUs to be larger or smaller
than the default, provided that they're above 1280.
Thoughts?
Hesham
===========================================================
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender
and delete all copies.
===========================================================
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
