All,
The feedback received (both on the list and off) indicates
a consensus to adopt this work by the WG. The next version
should be published as an IPv6 WG document.The working group now needs to ensure this document documents sufficiently the use of the M&O bits.
Regards, Bob & Brian IPv6 WG co-chairs
On Oct 26, 2004, at 10:15, Brian Haberman wrote:
All, This is a consensus call on whether the IPv6 WG should adopt:
Title : Consideration M and O Flags of IPv6 Router Advertisement Author(s) : S. Park, et al. Filename : draft-daniel-ipv6-ra-mo-flags-01.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2004-10-25
as a WG document. Comments and opinions can be sent to the mailing list and/or the chairs. We will accept comments on this call until 11/05/2004.
Regards, Bob & Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
