>
> In your previous mail you wrote:
>
> But the implications should IMHO be explored at some length first
> (maybe write an I-D?). Changing MAC addresses is going to cause
more
> disruption on the roaming host in case of false positives, i.e.,
the
> laptop thinks it moved but actually didn't, because the
communication
> using the old MAC address and resulting IP addresses is going to be
> disrupted unless you assume some kind of Neighbor Advertisement
> message use ("gratuitous ARP").
>
> => I have a concern here: this topic is clearly outside the scope of
> the IETF, i.e., it should be handled at the IEEE (in fact IMHO it is
> already handled by the IEEE :-).
Then how come this issue is discussed in this "I-D" (check the author
list
:-)
http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-haddad-momipriv-problem-statement-
00.txt
Since IETF's ARP and ND deal with the MAC addresses, I think some
discussion on that is needed at IETF.
Alper
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
