>>>>> On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:26:26 +1100,
>>>>> Greg Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> So if this is the case, we need to describe messages which request a
> response or change configuration state without having LLAOs.
> How about a paragraph (maybe somewhere else) saying:
> "... It is possible that a host may receive a solicitation or a router
(snip)
> ..."
> I'm not sure about whether this is better or not perhaps this could go
> into 7.2.X, in an effort to tie the exercise to address resolution,
> rather than reception of a particular message (considering that the
> document is basically broken into 3 sections: RD, ND, Redirect).
I think this type of general clarification makes sense.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
