On 7 Apr 2005, at 03:23, Rob Austein wrote:
At Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:50:52 -0700, Fred Baker wrote:
proposed text...
While I appreciate the effort that Fred put into crafting text, I'd prefer Brian's original proposal.
To further paraphrase Rob's comments here, there is a lot to think about when considering the deployment of services using anycast; to insert comprehensive text on that subject into the draft at hand would require a lot more than two paragraphs.
The issues that Fred addressed with his text are discussed at length in draft-ietf-grow-anycast. I would submit that the grow document is the right place for them, and that it's not necessary to duplicate them in the v6 addressing architecture: in fact, I think clarity is best served by keeping them separate.
Joe
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
