On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:52:26AM +0100, Tim Chown wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 12:39:25PM -0500, Stephen Sprunk wrote: > > > > I also believe that we should be watching the IPv6 PI policy proposal at > > ARIN et al; if the ARIN proposal is approved (and other RIRs follow suit), I > > see little reason to continue work on centrally-assigned ULAs. > > I disagree. The ARIN proposal seems to be 'PI for any ASN holder' in which > case > > a) this will limit who gets the PI space to large organisations > b) be limited by the 16-bit ASN space (and may create a land rush) > c) be useless to the small end site that wants to use unique ULAs > > But I may have misunderstood the ARIN proposal :)
Following up to myself, the proposal in fact says 'sites who could qualify for an ASN'. But that does limit who could use this source for PI. -- Tim/::1 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
