Hi Jinmei,
At 2:57 AM +0900 5/14/05, JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= wrote:
I've asked related questions about this comment on the wg list two times, including requested information at the Minneapolis meeting, but I've not got any responses...if this comment does not require any change to the document itself, I believe we are done. If it does, or if it requires any particular action (e.g., collecting implementation report), please clarify that.
It sounds like he document is ready, which is great, thanks!
It is up to the WG Chairs, Bob and Brian, to put together an implementation report. In this particular case, this may only involve pointing at the old implementation report and explaining why the changes in this document do not warrant gathering further implementation data. I will work with Bob and Brian on this.
As I answered at this list, 2461bis and 2462bis should be updated at the same timing, so we'll eventually need to wait for 2461bis to be approved. If we reach the point, please just keep 2461bis sleeping for now.
Brian and Bob, what is the status on 2461bis? Are we expecting it to be submitted for publication soon?
Thanks, Margaret
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
