thanks Nick. /jim > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Nick 'Sharkey' Moore > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 6:17 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: DAD > > On 2005-05-17, Bound, Jim wrote: > > > > There is also Optimistic DAD that can be used for commercial mobile > > devices on wireless networks, one should review and check. > But, today I > > am aware of no implementations that do not implement DAD or have > > implemented Optimistic DAD (but there are folks on this > list that can > > correct me if Optimistic DAD has been implemented???). > > Optimistic DAD is in the Standards Track queue now. > We implemented it for Linux as part of the development process, and > I'll make the patch available again soon ... I'm working on other > things until the IESG/etc comments come back, then I'll update the > patch and release. Some vendors have expressed their interest in > implementing once it is nailed down in an RFC. > > Linux, at least, can be set up to not run DAD very simply by setting > the DAD retransmits parameter to 0. Whether this is a good idea is > another matter. > > There's some discussion of the original poster's question in the > OptiDAD draft: see draft-ietf-ipv6-optimistic-dad-05.txt > > cheers, > > -----Nick > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
