draft-pettland already contains something to speed up the RA. It doesn't
have to be a separate WG item.
jak
----- Original Message -----
From: "Soohong Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'Soliman, Hesham'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>; "'JINMEI
Tatuya / ????'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'James Kempf'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Brett Pentland'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Mohamed Khalil'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 12:51 AM
Subject: RE: rfc2461bis issue 257 resolved? fast RA issue
> Just clarifying.
>
> > We'll be interested in IPv6 WG members' feedback on the solution
> > which is adopted as a DNA WG draft.
> >
> > So I request that the issue be removed from the 2461bis issue
> > tracker list.
>
> Greg, are you saying that the FastRA was already accepted
> as DNA WG item ? I didn't include this consideration with
> my previous response. Just saying FastRA and 2461bis are
> not well matched in my opinion...Adopting FastRA as DNA
> WG item seems another issue.
>
> Thanks.
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
> Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
