On 3-jun-2005, at 8:38, Christian Schild wrote:

I don't believe that suppression of (client) DHCPv6 packets is
enforceable. What if the client is not pleased with what he got?

Whether something is enforceable is not the point. The IETF can't enforce _anything_, that's a given.

What's important is the default behavior. We MUST avoid a situation where hosts do DHCPv6 out of the box regardless of the value of the M and O bits.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to