>>>>> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:28:02 +0530,
>>>>> Syam Madanapalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The flags are just hints, the host can always ignore
> them. If it is inappropriate to try to use DHCP when flags
> are zero, let it be so. Similarly if the flag(s) is (are) set,
> the host can always ignore.
Yes, this is my understanding, too, and I think we don't have to
revisit this agreement. However, at this stage of listing
requirements, I'd rather be open to any possibilities, including
those which could be regarded as a trigger. In fact, the next stage
where we'll discuss how to implement those, we may reject some of the
requirements if we cannot find any way of realizing them without
breaking the base consensus.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
