>Let me try to offer a point here (and sorry if this is too early) why >I don't think a MUST NOT is not a requirement.
>[omitted] On the other hand, if a >vendor does implement it, and the user has to pay for the wasted >bandwidth, I guess the user is going to complain about it and it'll >get fixed. I see and that is an important point to vendors, however a host already configures its address can invoke at least ICB to get its information regardless of RA indication. Regards, --------------------------------------- Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park) Mobile Platform Lab., SAMSUNG Electronics. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
