On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 05:43:27AM -0400, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > Hi Tony, > > >I choose not to try to get to the mic, but on the debated requirement > >point > >3; why is there a belief that the DHCP relay information is correctly > >configured if the simpler set of 2 bits is improperly configured? > > > >I agree that point 1 & 3 are in direct conflict and that 1 is the real > >requirement. > > This is my real problem as I said at the mic. I personally like > Requirement 1 more than requirement 3. If requirement 3 is absolute, > we might as well have these flags removed altogether as the > hosts do not care.
Yes, advance 1 and discard 3. Explore ramifications of 2 in dhc WG. -- Tim/::1 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
