On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Brian Haberman wrote:
I would like to solicit opinions from the working group on the suggestions above. Specifically, the proposal would render existing implementations non-conformant to the spec. The primary goal of this work has been to document what the existing code bases support, so I will not make this change unless I see a true consensus to do so.
In all fairness, I think it should be emphasized that even though implementations not doing those would not be conformant, they'd still continue to work just fine with the regular "link-local" scenario.
As such, I personally don't see making implementations non-conformant a big issue considering they'd still continue to work fine in the typical scenarios.
-- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
