On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, John Spence wrote:
So, in 99% of cases, I suppose, the multiple /48s would work. It just might not be quite as clean. If you said to a site "you can either generate yourself FD85:19EA:73C8::/47, or you can generate and use FD85:19EA:73C8::/48 and FD1B:9567:CD12::/48", enterprises would choose a contiguous /47 in most every case.
Note that they could just simply use FD85:19EA:73C8::/47; it's not like anyone is going to ask them to prove that they actually random-generated FD85:19EA:73C8::/48 and FD85:19EA:73C9::/48 (What a coincidence! :)
-- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
