Hi,
I think I found a small typo in the draft: -
asymmetric reachability
- a link where non-reflexive and/or non-transitive
reachability is part of normal operation. (Non-
reflexive reachability means packets from A reach B
but packets from B don't reach A.
I think reflexive is the wrong term here, by definition "A relation R on
a set A is called reflexive if and only if < a, a > R for every element
a of A."
I think the exact term here is symmetric and not reflexive. The sentence
should read
asymmetric reachability
- a link where non-symmetric and/or non-transitive
reachability is part of normal operation. (Non-
symmetric reachability means packets from A reach B
but packets from B don't reach A.
Thanks,
Vishwas
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
