>>>>> On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:43:29 +0200 (EET),
>>>>> Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Issue 1: Restrict operation of the protocol to link-local use.
>>
>> Resolution:
>> The consensus is to retain the more flexible multi-hop capability.
>> An additional sentence or two will be added to the Security
>> Considerations section recommending the filtering of these
>> messages at administrative boundaries.
> I did not see such consensus. I saw about 5 people agreeing to the
> (by-default) limitation, and one person (Alain Durand) opposed.
> Rather, to me, it seemed like rough consensus to make the change.
> Did I miss something?
Yes, you did. I also agreed with Alain.
But I also agree that we did not see a clear consensus on this (either
retaining or dropping the multi-hop capability). I guess most people,
even including those who expressed the preference, actually didn't
care much about this issue, and such observation led to the Brian's
conclusion. I'm (of course) happy with the proposal, but if others
have strong an objection, we'll then need further detailed discussion.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
