I was confused when I read the draft about the change to the multicast address.
I reread the draft and realized where the confusion arrises in the second
paragraph of section 5 it states:
"Append the first 32 bits of that 128-bit hash to the prefix
FF02:0:0:0:0:2:FF::/104."
Should this read:
"Append the first 24 bits of that 128-bit hash to the prefix
FF02:0:0:0:0:2:FF::/104."
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Bob Hinden
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 18:34
To: IPv6 WG
Subject: IPv6 WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-lookups-13.txt>
This starts a two week IPv6 working group last call on publishing
Title : IPv6 Node Information Queries
Author(s) : M. Crawford, B. Haberman
Filename : draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-lookups-13.txt
Pages : 15
Date : 2006-1-4
as an Experimental RFC. Please send substantive comments to the IPv6
mailing list. Editorial comments can be sent to the authors. Also,
note the current discussion on the IPv6 mailing list started by David
Malone.
This last call will end on January 19, 2005.
Regards,
Bob
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
