John, what do you propose to do about RFC2893?
(email attached)
I am fine with the changes proposed below for the other items.
-Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 4:55 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt
>
> Hi all,
>
> I propose to update the Node Requirements to handle these:
>
> RFC2401 is now obsoleted by RFC4301
> RFC2402 is now obsoleted by RFC4302
> RFC2404 is now obsoleted by RFC4305
> RFC2406 is now obsoleted by RFC4303, RFC4305
> RFC2407,2408,2409 are now obsoleted by RFC4306
>
> Changes are:
>
> "AH [RFC-4202] MAY be supported."
>
> These texts would be removed:
> "RFC-2401 is being updated by the IPsec Working Group."
> "RFC-2406 and RFC 2402 are being updated by the IPsec Working
Group."
>
> The plan would be to update these during AUTH48, assuming the WG
agrees
> with
> changes.
>
> ========
>
> OLD:
> 8.1 Basic Architecture
>
> Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol [RFC-2401] MUST be
> supported. RFC-2401 is being updated by the IPsec Working Group.
>
> NEW:
>
> 8.1 Basic Architecture
>
> Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol [RFC-4301] MUST be
> supported.
>
> ==========
>
> OLD:
> 8.2 Security Protocols
>
> ESP [RFC-2406] MUST be supported. AH [RFC-2402] MUST be supported.
> RFC-2406 and RFC 2402 are being updated by the IPsec Working Group.
>
> NEW
> 8.2 Security Protocols
>
> ESP [RFC-4306] MUST be supported. AH [RFC-4302] MAY be supported.
>
> ============
>
> I need to double-check sections 8.3 & 8.4, there are a few changes for
> these. I will
> send suggested changes.
>
> John
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Begin Message ---
Here's another one:
RFC2893 is now obsoleted by RFC4213
Section 6.l.1 says:
"RFC 2893 is currently being updated."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Dave Thaler
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 3:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt
>
> The draft in the RFC-editors queue now references obsoleted (as of
last
> month) RFCs. Specifically:
> RFC2401 is now obsoleted by RFC4301
> RFC2402 is now obsoleted by RFC4302
> RFC2404 is now obsoleted by RFC4305
> RFC2406 is now obsoleted by RFC4303, RFC4305
> RFC2407,2408,2409 are now obsoleted by RFC4306
>
> Also two statements in section 8 are now obsolete as a result:
> "RFC-2401 is being updated by the IPsec Working Group."
> "RFC-2406 and RFC 2402 are being updated by the IPsec Working
Group."
>
> Can these be updated?
>
> -Dave
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--- End Message ---
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
