Fred
I assume you're referring to this :
1) Routers that are reachable or probably reachable (i.e., in any
state other than INCOMPLETE) SHOULD be preferred over routers
whose reachability is unknown or suspect (i.e., in the
INCOMPLETE state, or for which no Neighbor Cache entry exists).
Further implementation hints on default router selection when
multiple equivalent routers are available are discussed in
[LD-SHRE].
Can you please elaborate on what this change will do and why it is more
inclusive? just trying to understand.
I'll add in the reference for [LD-SHRE], thanks.
Hesham
________________________________
From: Templin, Fred L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 11:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RFC2461(bis), section 6.3.6
I would like to see something a bit more inclusive in
(RFC2461(bis),
section 6.3.6) for default router selection when not all routers
on the
link are equivalent, e.g., when a wireless host sees routers
with
varying link quality. Suggestion is to simply change:
INCOMPLETE state, or for which no Neighbor Cache entry
exists).
to:
INCOMPLETE state, for which no Neighbor Cache entry exists,
etc.).
This could either go in the next draft version or as an AUTH48
item.
(Also the reference for [LD-SHRE] is missing.)
Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
