On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 13:10 -0400, Manfredi, Albert E wrote: First of all it's the 31st of May, not the 1st of April.... The mailheaders seem to be fine, but I still don't think they are genuine. Please sign your messages with PGP then we know who the joke is really coming from ;)
If you need more address space then go to the RIR in your area and REQUEST the address space. Pay them the LIR fee and RECEIVE the address space from them. But hurry current calculations say it is gone per 2015. And because of things like: http://web.zshell.net/vhost.php maybe even quicker.... otherwise said those sites can get IP addresses, then you can also get them. [..] > What if the private IP addresses behind the NAT became explicitly > visible from the WAN side of the NAPT box? Packets addressed to hosts > behind the NAT would carry both the global IP address of the NAT and, > appended, the private IP address of the host. The DNS would also carry > that information. Why invent silly work arounds like this? This already exists: - Expanded address space: IPv6 : 128bits - DNS change: AAAA Please, install IPv6 on your boxes not IPv4+weirdstuff. Note also that your applications would have to be upgraded anyway to be able to understand this construct, just like they have to already with IPv6. [..] > The address notation might look something like > > 138.194.35.33:192.168.1.5 Which looks just like: 2002:aabb:ccdd:ee:ff:11:22:33:: Guess why there is IPv6.... Please read up on the large variety of transition mechanisms that the IETF have already come up with over the years, there is bound to be one that solves your problem. Greets, Jeroen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
