Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 29 May 2006 19:23:36 +0900), Arifumi
Matsumoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> * to update default rule.
> The default rule today is:
> Prefix Precedence Label
> ::1/128 50 0
> ::/0 40 1
> 2002::/16 30 2
> ::/96 20 3
> ::ffff:0:0/96 10 4
>
> What we should consider now is,
> - IPv4-compatible IPv6 address is deprecated.(RFC4291)
> - Teredo is defined. (RFC4380)
:
> - ULA should have less precedence than IPv4.
:
> Prefix Precedence Label
> ::1/128 50 0
> ::/0 40 1
> 2002::/16 30 2
> ::ffff:0:0/96 10 3
> fc00::/7 8 4
> 2001::/32 5 5
It is fine to add fc00::/7 and 2001::/32 is fine, however,
it is not good to delete ::/96.
Please don't introduce incompatibility here.
Peserve current label even if we remove ::/96; e.g.
Prefix Precedence Label
::1/128 50 0
::/0 40 1
2002::/16 30 2
::ffff:0:0/96 10 4
fc00::/7 8 5
2001::/32 5 6
is fine.
Regards,
--yoshfuji
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
