>> But then I have a related question: why is this document supposed to >> be an Experimental RFC, rather than a Proposed Standard? I originally >> thought it was because the spec is going to be standardized against >> the 'design principle' as a special exception. > > At this point, I don't remember exactly why the authors submitted for > experimental as the topic has a long complicated history. For > example see: RFC4339 "IPv6 Host Configuration of DNS Server > Information Approaches".
In last year back, Margaret had agreed to sponsor this document in the IESG for Experimental. That is all in my memory. I don't have any history in there. In fact, I prefer PS to Experimental of course. Regards, Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park) Mobile Convergence Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
