In your previous mail you wrote: On 8/8/06, Francis Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In your previous mail you wrote: > > The I-D: > draft-madanapalli-ipv6-periodic-rtr-advts-00.txt > proposes several changes to ND procedures and parameters. > > => I strongly object not about the document itself but about its > principle because IMHO the link-layer should adapt, not the network layer. Will you please clarify this? => is it not clear enough? The problem is a link one so the solution should be found in link device, not by changing IPv6.
If the network layer is sending some packets to the MN, how can the link layer adapts in this case. The link layer either can drop/delay the packets but purpose of sending an RAs to the hosts is lost. => IMHO the best idea to solve this class of issues is in draft-ietf-dna-frd-01.txt (i.e., cache the last RA in the AP). The draft aims to reduce the dependency on the periodic RAs for the mobile nodes, and hence the benifits of power and bandwidth saving. => this is a problem of the link dormant mode facility so it should *not* be solved by changing the network protocol. Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
