Fred, >OK, I see now. When Tim first contacted me he came >across with a certain >sense of naivety
If you wish to remain focused on the issue at hand (namely, the merit of the proposal we have placed before the group), please do so. As for such impressions about me, please keep them off this list. >that doesn't seem to be supported by his interactions >here and he led me to >believe Try to take some responsibility for what you believe, Fred. Also, your analysis of a private thread which you in fact began is not fodder for this list. >that he was talking about new ICMP messages for >prefix delegation. Then >later, when I suggested to >Tim that RS/RA could be used for the PD, he told >me >that yes in fact that was what he would be proposing >and he ended the >discussion with what I could only >describe as a certain sense of >self-righteousness. Again Fred, you need to stop using pejorative terms (e.g. "naivety", "self-righteousness") in reference to me. Please keep your opinions of me to yourself. If you continue to be compelled to cast aspersions, kindly do so in a not-so-public forum. If however you wish to engage in a technical or procedural debate about our ICMPv6 PD proposal, this list is the forum for that. > >Fred >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Matthew 7:5 Tim Rom 8:28 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
