>>>>> On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 06:13:17 -0400,
>>>>> Ralph Droms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm sorry for introducing other recommendations into your thread. I
> forwarded comments from a private exchange about the draft. I'll separate
> the other recommendations out into a different thread.
> I don't have a strong opinion about your text, either and perhaps brevity is
> a virtue. How about:
> One way to avoid having a static non-changing address is to use
> DHCPv6 [DHCPV6] for obtaining addresses. Section 12 of RFC 3315
> discusses the use of DHCPv6 for the assignment and management
> of "temporary addresses", which are never renewed and provide the same
> property of temporary addresses described in this document with regards
> to the privacy concern.
I'm fine with this text. We might want to replace "RFC 3315" with
[DHCPV6] for consistency though.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
