Bernie Volz (volz) writes:
> I would think that how an address is assigned shouldn't enter into this.
> I can't see that it matters.
It matters only in that different assignment mechanisms have different
inherent stabilities:
manual: "forever"
DHCPv6: until the lifetime expires and the server refuses to
renew
stateless: until the network interface hardware is swapped
temporary: "soon"
> What really matters is the lifetimes associated with the address. The
> longest lifetime address is probably the best to use since it is the
> most stable. [Ignoring privacy and other related issues.]
>
> Perhaps this gets at what you want anyway, since manually assigned
> addresses would presumable have the longest lifetime?
Yes, that's equivalent.
--
James Carlson, KISS Network <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
