Selon Pars MUTAF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Firstly, the multicast name resolution idea that started > with ZEROCONF (if I'm correct), has the potential to find > many new and popular applications.
Dear AD, chairs, folks; I would like to bring a new problem statement draft to your attention (1 page). Until it appears in the I-D rep, please find it here: http://www.freewebs.com/pmutaf/draft-mutaf-piqproblem-00.txt I believe that not having this application would be very unfortunate. (I think this is an INT area topic.) And currently available name resolution techniques do not address this problem as they should. Do you have any comments on this problem statement? Thanks. pars mutaf ps: sorry I kept the IPv6 WG CCed, but it looked like a good idea because I was forwarded to namedroppers by IPv6 folks. I wanted to keep them informed. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
