Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> It's expired. Try >> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-haberman-ipv6-ra-flags-option-00.txt > > The draft describes an option to be included in the RA. However, > section 4 calls it a "NDP Expansion Option", meaning this option could > be included in - other than RA - NDP messages(?)
I suppose it could but the context is lost given that the IANA registry starts with the flag bits already defined in the RA header. > > One would clarify that this Flags Expansion Option is to be used only > preceded by the RA header (Type 134). > > At least because the necessity of this new option with flags comes > exclusively from the lack of flag space in RA, not in NS for example. > > No? > That is true. We can certainly incorporate text to make that explicit. Regards, Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
