Hi Bernie,
Instead of step 4, perhaps step 4 (or as part of 3) should state
> that the individual/group bit (bit 7) should be set to 0 to > indiciate individual (unless a group identifier were being generated,
which I don't think is the point of this draft). There is no mention
> of this bit in the document.
I don't know if there is such a thing as a group identifier. I have always been uncomfortable with the meaning of this bit in the IID. RFC4291 refers to flipping a unique bit in the EUI-64 and EUI-64 does not mention a group/individual bit.
Thanks Suresh -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
