> Le 26 avr. 07 .AN` 02:39, Bob Hinden a Nicrit :*B
ah, finally. i even try to reach Steve saying "no time for Salmon
fishing, man".
> > [trimming this to just the IPv6 w.g.]
> >
> > We think the question for the IPv6 working group on this topic is
> > does the working group want to do anything to address the issues
> > raised about the Type 0 routing header. Possible actions include:
> >
> > 1) Deprecate all usage of RH0
> > 2) Recommend that RH0 support be off by default in hosts and routers
> > 3) Recommend that RH0 support be off by default in hosts
> > 4) Limit it's usage to one RH0 per IPv6 packet and limit the number
> > of addresses in one RH0.
> >
> > These examples are not all mutually exclusive.
> >
> > Please respond to the list with your preference and justifications.
are you still did not get the urgency? haven't you read my analysis
and THE PDF file? it's total doomsday for IPv6 (if not the planet).
we were really lucky that IPv6-haters did not get it.
do you know how many sleepless nights i have been spending starting
last Friday (when theo woke me up and pointed me to the PDF).
we must spread the word "never miss the next software update from Apple"
since Apple is the most dangerous beast since it does 6to4/teredo
(oops, was teredo MS only?) by default. we have already leaked it
to the japanese press people. i wonder how many of them are clever
enough to understand it (i told my close friend but he works for
TV station, so i even leaked the real effect).
itojun
PS: if i do not get postel award (if not novel prize of peace) i'll quit KAME
and become a new life as a freelance IPv6 evangelist. first target is Skype,
which is totally IPv6-unfriendly.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
