> Bob Hinden wrote:
> > [trimming this to just the IPv6 w.g.]
> >
> > We think the question for the IPv6 working group on this topic is does
> > the working group want to do anything to address the issues raised about
> > the Type 0 routing header. Possible actions include:
> >
> > 1) Deprecate all usage of RH0
> > 2) Recommend that RH0 support be off by default in hosts and routers
>
> I see these two as being equivalent. If RH0 is going to be off by
> default in routers, then it's for all intents and purposes unusable and
> should be fully deprecated.
no, do not place sysctl. devote time to develop new type 'routing
header type 123' instead.
it does not have bad sideffect but can perform something like rthdr0.
in this doomsday story and samurais saving the planet, we were extremely
lucky beacause:
- iPv6-haters still didn't get it (or did they changed their mind?)
- MIP6 was NOT using rthdr0
it's a message from god.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
