On May 3, 2007, at 5:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Thu, 3 May 2007 13:41:12 +0200,
Ebalard, Arnaud wrote:
Le 1 mai 07 à 23:18, George V. Neville-Neil a écrit :
Actually I like this solution.
Now, not to beat a dead horse more, but when can a draft be set
up to
talk about this?
I would already have pushed a submission but I'm not familiar with
the associated IETF process. I suspect it will take me quite some
time to do it the wrong way.
Can someone more familiar with it initiate the submission? I'll be
happy to take part to the discussions and reviewing process.
I too can be involved in the draft, but also have never written one on
my own.
hello gentleman,
found some answers about creating and submitting RFCs here:
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcfaq.html>
some tips here
<ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc-editor/instructions2authors.txt>
peace
marc
Best,
George
--
Development is when you know the answer, but not how to get there.
Applied research is when you know the question, but not the answer.
Pure research is when you don't know the question."
web: http://www.let.de
.local http://stattfernsehen.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
