> On 16-mei-2007, at 10:05, Ebalard, Arnaud wrote:
>
> > Should (can) something like the following be added to the draft ?:
> > "Conformant implementations of IPv6 hosts and routers MUST not
> > provide a way to activate RH0 processing on the system."
>
> This is a very bad idea for two reasons:
>
> 1. The IPv6 spec says that you MUST implement it, then having
> something else say you MUST NOT actually use it is just bad standards
> making
>
> 2. Maybe someone has a legitimate use for this, they should be able
> to do so if they want
how many times do i have to post this: there's ZERO RFCs that use
rthdr0. nuke it immediately for the sake of world peace.
as the firm believer of running code (not the spec), i urge you to
look at http://www.kame.net/newsletter/20070502/rthdr0.diff.txt
and check out the comments.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
