Hi Itojun, I agree to the solution. If we get more people talking about the need for this, we can actually revive the draft.
Thanks, Vishwas On 5/17/07, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino 2.0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the time of bringing up the amplification attacks i had also > brought up the issue of > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-manral-v6ops-tiny-fragments-issues-02 . > > I would want to know if this issue needs to looked further by IPv6. my take on this is that, for non-final fragment, the packet size must not be smaller than 1280 bytes. there's no valid use for smaller fragments (unless you have special network with MTU < 1280). KAME node will not generate such packets/fragments, but KAME node would accept those packets happily. any ideas? itojun -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
