Hi all,
I've identified the following areas in which 00 might be modified,
based on traffic in this list and a small handful of private mail.
Please comment on the following, and point out any other outstanding
issues that I missed.
I intend to circulate candidate text changes to this list before -01
is submitted, in the interests of making -01 as close to finished as
possible.
1. More description on what the potential problems with RH0 are.
Whilst it appears there there is general agreement that a detailed
treatment would best belong in a separate document, some stand-alone
summaries in deprecate-rh0 would be useful.
Illjitsch sent some text, and I had previously worked on some
summaries of the issues presented at CanSecWest. I propose to add
some suitable summary text to the Security Considerations section.
2. More precise description of what deprecate means in the context of
this document.
3. Tidying up the language in section 4.2 ("regardless of type") to
make it less ambiguous.
4. Adding "Updates: 4294" (IPv6 Node Requirements).
What else did I miss?
Joe
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
